You stated in "The President-King" that "The EOP is like a corporation" and "the agencies of government report to the EOP".
There are MANY sources that say the USA IS a corporation, not just is "like" one...AND that each State is also a corporation.
If the US is a corporation, that would be a reason why its citizens might be (are) treated like corporate assets.
A corporation logically implements Government That Provides Wealth, which is incompatible with Government That Protects Rights, and our US history is an example of a live test of this former "theory".
I don't prefer your "King" term since nowhere is filial passing of government authorized -- yet in fact we have experienced it via the 13 Families.
Government That Provides Wealth is no different than Government By A Shipload Of Pirates if you read the Articles generally signed by pirate crews. GTPW overwhelms GTPR because IT PAYS its adherents and promises to pay its voter base. GTPR is weaker and more vulnerable because it does not promise wealth, and requires thought, study, and experience to understand its value, much less value it enough to invest time in public service and duties of citizenship.
The assertion that the United States is a corporation is a misconception that requires clarification. When references are made to a 'king-president' or 'president-king,' they are not alluding to a corporate structure but rather to concerns about the concentration of power within a single office or individual. This speaks to a perceived deficiency in the system of checks and balances that underpins our constitutional federal republic.
Your analogy of the government as a vessel, akin to a ship laden with pirates, invites a deeper exploration of the relationship between governance and wealth distribution. It is not the government itself that generates wealth; rather, it serves as a conduit or vessel through which societal resources are channeled. The pirates in your metaphor may symbolize those who wield power and influence within this system, and it is they, not the ship itself, who determine the distribution of wealth.
Our pride in the American system of government, with its intricate checks and balances and steadfast adherence to the Constitution, should not blind us to the imperfections that may exist within it. The question of whether the U.S. is incorporated is, in many ways, a distraction from the more pressing issue of corruption. The vessel may be sound, but if those guiding it are corrupt, then the integrity of the entire enterprise is compromised.
Thus, we are led to a singular and inescapable conclusion: The solution lies not in altering the structure of the vessel but in changing the individuals who guide it. It is a call to ethical stewardship, a recognition that the health of the republic depends not merely on laws and institutions but on the character and integrity of those who inhabit them.
This leads us to a singular conclusion and a unique opportunity: The imperative to engage with local politics and to undertake the task of excising those metaphorical 'pirates' from our system. The imagery of 'gutting the pirates' is a vivid call to action, urging us to confront corruption and malfeasance at the grassroots level.
In a DECENTRALIZED REPUBLIC society, local politics serves as the crucible of civic engagement, where the values and principles of the republic are tested and refined. It is here that the metaphorical 'pirates'—those who would subvert the common good for personal gain—can be most effectively challenged and reformed.
The task is not merely one of removal but of transformation. To 'gut the pirates' is to recognize the potential for redemption and growth within our political system. It is a call to elevate public discourse, to foster transparency and accountability, and to cultivate a political culture that honors the dignity and worth of every individual.
In this endeavor, we are all called to be both sailors and shipwrights, navigating the turbulent seas of politics and shaping the vessel of our government. It is a journey that demands courage, wisdom, and a steadfast commitment to the ideals that define our constitutional federal republic.
I would have faith in the existing system if I had confidence that candidates would do what they promise to do. Immediate recall would be a reform that would FORCE candidates to do this, and is now technologically feasible. A Right To Truth would FORCE candidates to answer questions truthfully, to stand on one side or the other of the Line in The Sand. Most candidates today have no Honor we can rely upon, they have a profit motive. The People need more control. To do this I personally see no alternative to doing away with Secret Ballot (NOT IN THE CONSTITUTION) because there is really no plan that works when ballots are at ANY point secret and we no longer need such secrecy. Also, we need laws and amendments to deal with profit while in government. What attracts people to this should be service, not profit or notoriety. Probably service in the legislatures should be duty for a limited period of time, such as the first few years out of college, and then afterwards a person can be concerned with family and career.
No, I firmly disagree that our system as written works properly and effectively, it needs work, and I write this in defiance of the "WHO are YOU" caterpillar, with the reply, "CAN'T never did ANYTHING".
Yes, but once local change has been implemented, we must reduce the federal government, remove the unconstitutional agencies and return constitutional authority delegated to the states back to the states.
" we are seeing the first Presidential administration since President Hoover’s that is acting in a constitutional manner." + "have you noticed that when the Biden Administration attempts an overt violation of civil liberties they get tripped right at the last minute, or stopped in a lawsuit" -
How are the J6 Prisoners still in prisons, have never been allowed their CONSTITUTIONAL rights. Why were people forced to take the poison to stay employed? Why were many fired because they refused? How can any of this take place if biden is "acting in a constitutional manner?" Why does it take Lawsuits to obtain/regain our constitutional rights? When will J6ers get a chance to sue for their rights?
I am a nobody that has done more research then most famous "Anons". I'm ot an avid "Q" follower but Q did lead me to the Truth and the research. I am grateful for that but I feel Q was compromised at some point and that led to all of us being censored and unable to save many many lives. Faith in God and prayers are our only hope now. 🙏
You write that an aeroplane hit the twin towers: "Flight 11 hit Tower 1 of the WTC". That makes it very difficult for me to comprehend you. Why do you do that?
Very interesting thesis and it fills in a lot of unexplained actions by previous administrations. Obama missed one of the most important goals in his part of the 16 year plan - removing the weapons from the citizenry. In fact, the purchase of weapons and ammunition has steadily increased. I consider there was much more to 911 than the EOs Bush signed as well as the Patriot Act. Rumsfeld announced the $3 trillion dollars ‘unaccounted for’ in the DoD; also directly previous to 911, the day before. Your research definitely has filled in significant gaps. God bless your group.🙏
Bravo! I think you nailed the mechanism. Amazing, how much importance the overlords put on words, and their trickery knows no bounds - but it would appear there are two sides of the game, and some patriots have been doing their homework. All the word parsing comes to a stop, with one punch in the eye.
I’d like to see a way to elect better people without signing over our rights when we accept a voter registration. The registration has problems that I don’t want.. and frankly so does the driver license.
Thank you you’re very appreciated🇺🇸❤️🙏
Interesting Theory
Curious to know what part you thought was theory?
You stated in "The President-King" that "The EOP is like a corporation" and "the agencies of government report to the EOP".
There are MANY sources that say the USA IS a corporation, not just is "like" one...AND that each State is also a corporation.
If the US is a corporation, that would be a reason why its citizens might be (are) treated like corporate assets.
A corporation logically implements Government That Provides Wealth, which is incompatible with Government That Protects Rights, and our US history is an example of a live test of this former "theory".
I don't prefer your "King" term since nowhere is filial passing of government authorized -- yet in fact we have experienced it via the 13 Families.
Government That Provides Wealth is no different than Government By A Shipload Of Pirates if you read the Articles generally signed by pirate crews. GTPW overwhelms GTPR because IT PAYS its adherents and promises to pay its voter base. GTPR is weaker and more vulnerable because it does not promise wealth, and requires thought, study, and experience to understand its value, much less value it enough to invest time in public service and duties of citizenship.
The assertion that the United States is a corporation is a misconception that requires clarification. When references are made to a 'king-president' or 'president-king,' they are not alluding to a corporate structure but rather to concerns about the concentration of power within a single office or individual. This speaks to a perceived deficiency in the system of checks and balances that underpins our constitutional federal republic.
Your analogy of the government as a vessel, akin to a ship laden with pirates, invites a deeper exploration of the relationship between governance and wealth distribution. It is not the government itself that generates wealth; rather, it serves as a conduit or vessel through which societal resources are channeled. The pirates in your metaphor may symbolize those who wield power and influence within this system, and it is they, not the ship itself, who determine the distribution of wealth.
Our pride in the American system of government, with its intricate checks and balances and steadfast adherence to the Constitution, should not blind us to the imperfections that may exist within it. The question of whether the U.S. is incorporated is, in many ways, a distraction from the more pressing issue of corruption. The vessel may be sound, but if those guiding it are corrupt, then the integrity of the entire enterprise is compromised.
Thus, we are led to a singular and inescapable conclusion: The solution lies not in altering the structure of the vessel but in changing the individuals who guide it. It is a call to ethical stewardship, a recognition that the health of the republic depends not merely on laws and institutions but on the character and integrity of those who inhabit them.
This leads us to a singular conclusion and a unique opportunity: The imperative to engage with local politics and to undertake the task of excising those metaphorical 'pirates' from our system. The imagery of 'gutting the pirates' is a vivid call to action, urging us to confront corruption and malfeasance at the grassroots level.
In a DECENTRALIZED REPUBLIC society, local politics serves as the crucible of civic engagement, where the values and principles of the republic are tested and refined. It is here that the metaphorical 'pirates'—those who would subvert the common good for personal gain—can be most effectively challenged and reformed.
The task is not merely one of removal but of transformation. To 'gut the pirates' is to recognize the potential for redemption and growth within our political system. It is a call to elevate public discourse, to foster transparency and accountability, and to cultivate a political culture that honors the dignity and worth of every individual.
In this endeavor, we are all called to be both sailors and shipwrights, navigating the turbulent seas of politics and shaping the vessel of our government. It is a journey that demands courage, wisdom, and a steadfast commitment to the ideals that define our constitutional federal republic.
I would have faith in the existing system if I had confidence that candidates would do what they promise to do. Immediate recall would be a reform that would FORCE candidates to do this, and is now technologically feasible. A Right To Truth would FORCE candidates to answer questions truthfully, to stand on one side or the other of the Line in The Sand. Most candidates today have no Honor we can rely upon, they have a profit motive. The People need more control. To do this I personally see no alternative to doing away with Secret Ballot (NOT IN THE CONSTITUTION) because there is really no plan that works when ballots are at ANY point secret and we no longer need such secrecy. Also, we need laws and amendments to deal with profit while in government. What attracts people to this should be service, not profit or notoriety. Probably service in the legislatures should be duty for a limited period of time, such as the first few years out of college, and then afterwards a person can be concerned with family and career.
No, I firmly disagree that our system as written works properly and effectively, it needs work, and I write this in defiance of the "WHO are YOU" caterpillar, with the reply, "CAN'T never did ANYTHING".
Yes, but once local change has been implemented, we must reduce the federal government, remove the unconstitutional agencies and return constitutional authority delegated to the states back to the states.
Excellent read. Thank you.
If these statements are true:
" we are seeing the first Presidential administration since President Hoover’s that is acting in a constitutional manner." + "have you noticed that when the Biden Administration attempts an overt violation of civil liberties they get tripped right at the last minute, or stopped in a lawsuit" -
How are the J6 Prisoners still in prisons, have never been allowed their CONSTITUTIONAL rights. Why were people forced to take the poison to stay employed? Why were many fired because they refused? How can any of this take place if biden is "acting in a constitutional manner?" Why does it take Lawsuits to obtain/regain our constitutional rights? When will J6ers get a chance to sue for their rights?
I am a nobody that has done more research then most famous "Anons". I'm ot an avid "Q" follower but Q did lead me to the Truth and the research. I am grateful for that but I feel Q was compromised at some point and that led to all of us being censored and unable to save many many lives. Faith in God and prayers are our only hope now. 🙏
What do you make of all of his first day executive orders?
You write that an aeroplane hit the twin towers: "Flight 11 hit Tower 1 of the WTC". That makes it very difficult for me to comprehend you. Why do you do that?
wow
Very interesting thesis and it fills in a lot of unexplained actions by previous administrations. Obama missed one of the most important goals in his part of the 16 year plan - removing the weapons from the citizenry. In fact, the purchase of weapons and ammunition has steadily increased. I consider there was much more to 911 than the EOs Bush signed as well as the Patriot Act. Rumsfeld announced the $3 trillion dollars ‘unaccounted for’ in the DoD; also directly previous to 911, the day before. Your research definitely has filled in significant gaps. God bless your group.🙏
Bravo! I think you nailed the mechanism. Amazing, how much importance the overlords put on words, and their trickery knows no bounds - but it would appear there are two sides of the game, and some patriots have been doing their homework. All the word parsing comes to a stop, with one punch in the eye.
Thank you Sir. 🙏🏿 for a most clarifying and insightful view.
I’d like to see a way to elect better people without signing over our rights when we accept a voter registration. The registration has problems that I don’t want.. and frankly so does the driver license.
Great article, appreciate
Your work is fascinating and enjoy sharing it. Aka @missioncommand Truth Social